Make finding open content easier
when it's available incorporate simple license info into default search results [eg Creative Commons symbols]
when it's available incorporate simple license info into default search results [eg Creative Commons symbols]
Address the accessibility and usability of resources to individuals by supporting searching on simple Accessibility Metadata for resources such as IMS AccessForAll 3.0, the release of which is imminent.
Create an API to allow developers to search and access resources. The Sunlight Foundation helps government agencies open up their data and create APIs so developers can use the data in applications. They could be a great partner in your work.
Encourage content creators to embed license info into educational content as well as in metadata - eg through use of MS Research's Creative Commons plugin for Office [category of guidelines for content providers?]
Search Engines could add "Learning" to their standard home page options of Web, Images, Videos, Maps, News, Shopping and E-mail.
A web search engine crawler could use the same algorithms found in some commercial metadata generation products to intelligently extract metadata (interpolating such things as seat time for the learning object, intended audience, etc.). This metadata would then be available to search against and display in results through the "advanced search" function. And it could be submitted to a Learning Registry sandbox as a proposed ...more »
A web search engine crawler could use the same algorithms found in some commercial metadata generation products to intelligently extract metadata (interpolating such things as seat time for the learning object, intended audience, etc.). This metadata would then be available to search against and display in results through the "advanced search" function. And it could be submitted to a Learning Registry sandbox as a proposed new object for cataloguing.
« less full details »
Add a microformat to a piece of educational content so a search engine's bot or crawler knows its educational.
Something I have personally been thinking about for some time is that there are three distinct modes for organizing and finding resources and answers. Aaron's citation of the Dewey system is that of an authoritative taxonomy. The pros of these are that they are authoritative, relatively stable, and efficient at getting you somewhat near to the resources you want. They also work well as filtering methods if you are familiar ...more »
Something I have personally been thinking about for some time is that there are three distinct modes for organizing and finding resources and answers.
Aaron's citation of the Dewey system is that of an authoritative taxonomy. The pros of these are that they are authoritative, relatively stable, and efficient at getting you somewhat near to the resources you want. They also work well as filtering methods if you are familiar with the taxonomies. The cons are (a) they are static and rarely keep up with the modern pace of change (b) expensive if you want professionals to do the classification and questionable in the minds of authorities if you crowd source the classifications and (c) exclusive in the sense that there is a relatively steep educational and learning barrier for their use.
The second organizational method is generative. This is what we experience with standard search engines. Behind the scenes technology is indexing, re-indexing, reclassifying etc. on a more or less continual basis, and as searches are submitted the searches themselves become data that is used to organize the corpus of resources. The pros of this are that it is flexible, fast and generally effective. The cons are that (a) it takes a lot of resources and research to get beyond simple term matching and page ranking (b) many methods fail for collections that are too small (not enough link data) or too big (too many results) and (c) it is not trivial (even today) to learn to use search engines effectively.
The third method is social. This is the modern equivalent of "if you want to know something, ask a friend" but facilitated by social media. To the extent that the results of inquiries can be captured and fed into Generative methods, there are some real possibilities here since people are better than computers at understanding context and recognizing semantic equivalents within their domain of experience. The cons are (a) answers are non-authoritative (b) managing social search at scale is a new field with a host of challenges and (c) I am not sure if we have enough experience to gauge its true effectiveness.
Having said all that, my suggestion is that a fundamental principle for any search system or knowledge management system is that all three methods should be used and that each one should be used and combined when and where appropriate. Hope that makes some sense!
« less full details »
More free educational content from the states. Here at the Illinois State Library we developed the Illinois Digital Archives (IDA) to provide access to primary source materials in Illinois libraries, archives, museums, historical societies and other cultural institutions. It was designed to be a searchable repository for the Illinois State Library's digital collections as well as collections in other libraries and cultural ...more »
More free educational content from the states. Here at the Illinois State Library we developed the Illinois Digital Archives (IDA) to provide access to primary source materials in Illinois libraries, archives, museums, historical societies and other cultural institutions. It was designed to be a searchable repository for the Illinois State Library's digital collections as well as collections in other libraries and cultural institutions in Illinois. I would be glad to talk to you about what we have to share as you develop the content for the Learning Registry.
« less full details »
Extend XML Site Maps so one can specify that a resource is "educational."
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss with you the efforts around a very similar collaborative project lead by several State Technology Directors. In Ohio alone, we have gathered, disseminated, published over 4500 FREE digital media education assets. If you would like to learn more please contact me beth.cortolillo@etech.ohio.gov
Given how much educational content is put online in Zip format (or similar): encourage search engines to support selective indexing of the contents of Zip archives, for example through an extension to the Robots Exclusion Protocol [posted on behalf of Scott Wilson - CETIS]
Understand better the nature of learning and reflection. Search Engines have a role, a range of roles, but learning involves much more than discovering "learning content" through the use of keywords, tags, & other forms of metadata. Discovery needs to align better with query & sense-making. Support for well-formed questions would help -- "natural language search" only goes part of the way. Other scaffolding is necessary ...more »
Understand better the nature of learning and reflection. Search Engines have a role, a range of roles, but learning involves much more than discovering "learning content" through the use of keywords, tags, & other forms of metadata. Discovery needs to align better with query & sense-making. Support for well-formed questions would help -- "natural language search" only goes part of the way. Other scaffolding is necessary
« less full details »
I've tried to reflect on "how a search engine would be integrated with the Learning Registry?" - but since I don't know what the "Learning Registry" is yet, it's a difficult question to ponder. My first reaction is that registries don't "learn" - people "learn". So, perhaps it should be called an "educational content" registry so that it's clear that this is a place to find educational content (if in fact that is what ...more »
I've tried to reflect on "how a search engine would be integrated with the Learning Registry?" - but since I don't know what the "Learning Registry" is yet, it's a difficult question to ponder. My first reaction is that registries don't "learn" - people "learn". So, perhaps it should be called an "educational content" registry so that it's clear that this is a place to find educational content (if in fact that is what it is). Then my second comment would be that, well, registries don't appear to be very popular on the web (question to ask ourselves - why do we keep shooting ourselves in the foot by trying to do things in the educational community that the rest of the world dislikes? need a shrink to answer that one). But seriously, I don't personally use "registries" for anything. So, this leads me to think that search engines should be able to find the educational content where ever it may be - even if it is not in the registry. That is, the search engine builds the registry. So, instead of Google Ad Words, we set up a ranking algorithm for educational content and build an open source search engine to implement it. We publish the ranking algorithm as an open "standard" (ouch - sorry to have to use that word). And, we then invite the various educational content providers to expose the right metadata and other stuff to our bot and others that may get built. We ask Google to license their code to us for free because it is for educational purposes and because they are not evil. Ha ha. Just teaching you guys how to brainstorm!
I actually do believe the part about having to find the content where it is and build the registry - while at the same time enabling others to do similar things.
« less full details »
Create professional development opportunities around the Registry to help teachers best integrate digital resources into their teaching
I took a pretty deep look at LODE (an IMS working group) recently. It has a lot of features that we are going to need. I think it's potentially a huge step forward in the concept of registries for learning. I also saw it as maybe missing a few pieces, such as non-centralized augmented metadata: the ability for anyone to post defining/categorical information about anyone else's resources. So if NASA publishes a photo ...more »
I took a pretty deep look at LODE (an IMS working group) recently. It has a lot of features that we are going to need. I think it's potentially a huge step forward in the concept of registries for learning.
I also saw it as maybe missing a few pieces, such as non-centralized augmented metadata: the ability for anyone to post defining/categorical information about anyone else's resources. So if NASA publishes a photo about something, we don't want users to have to ask NASA's permission to categorize that photo or align it with other educational resources. The network should let them do that on their own (and let others find those categorizations right alongside of the original resource).
« less full details »
Are there any good/popular formats for structuring "paradata?" Also, how should paradata be stored? Is the publishing agent responsible for storing and sending it to anyone who asks for a period of time? Could we use a bittorrent concept to help make paradata available to all but without having to be stored by everyone? (Share the storage?) Paradata is any kind of usage data (whether raw weblogs, ratings, reviews, ...more »
Are there any good/popular formats for structuring "paradata?" Also, how should paradata be stored? Is the publishing agent responsible for storing and sending it to anyone who asks for a period of time?
Could we use a bittorrent concept to help make paradata available to all but without having to be stored by everyone? (Share the storage?)
Paradata is any kind of usage data (whether raw weblogs, ratings, reviews, comments, etc)
« less full details »
From my perspective the four problems areas that were partly elaborated on the blog and also fed into the discussion topics below are all interrelated. I don't believe you can arrive at independent solutions and expect them to work as a whole (not suggesting that is what you are actually trying to do but has an impact on the discussion). Normally in solution design there needs to be clarification of the "business" requirements, ...more »
From my perspective the four problems areas that were partly elaborated on the blog and also fed into the discussion topics below are all interrelated. I don't believe you can arrive at independent solutions and expect them to work as a whole (not suggesting that is what you are actually trying to do but has an impact on the discussion). Normally in solution design there needs to be clarification of the "business" requirements, objectives, related activities, end-user requirements etc to clarify the role of the project and the interrelationships between the parts before you can get into the detail, flexibility requirements and technical requirements. I am worried to see an early suggestion of any technology, standard or specification in advance of clarifying the sorts of requirements that should drive the design and then the development. Perhaps that is just my solution architecture bent, but I often see problems arise when the technology drives the agenda instead of serving the agenda.
The clarification of the end-user requirements and project scope and responsibilities, etc will tell you a lot about scale, community of practice engagement, "plugins" to the NLR, augmentation practices of target communities (and therefore crosswalking/harmonization requirements) etc.
You are all smart people, there is no doubt about that or the kinds of issues raised here would not have been raised already, so I am sure that you will be thinking a lot about the issues I've mentioned. It would certainly help if we had some further insight because it will help us to provide more focused information into your activities.
« less full details »
Please help educators understand the full benefits of using assistive technology to accommodate students who need extra reading and writing support. These tools aren't just for kids with special needs. If administrators clearly recognized the value of these tools, more students would get the help they need earlier in their schooling years and school budgets would enjoy more economies of scale to spread the cost per ...more »
Please help educators understand the full benefits of using assistive technology to accommodate students who need extra reading and writing support. These tools aren't just for kids with special needs. If administrators clearly recognized the value of these tools, more students would get the help they need earlier in their schooling years and school budgets would enjoy more economies of scale to spread the cost per student. Thanks!
« less full details »
you could have a phrase you put in front of your search (e.g. have "learn:" just as you have "define:" and "recipe:", as a complement to the additional information needed on the content tagging side
An interesting project that could provide input as learning resources is NEON - http://www.neoninc.org. The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) is prototyping an architecture that will collect data across the United States on the impacts of climate change, land use change and invasive species on natural resources and biodiversity. NEON is a project of the U.S. National Science Foundation, with many other U.S. ...more »
An interesting project that could provide input as learning resources is NEON - http://www.neoninc.org. The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) is prototyping an architecture that will collect data across the United States on the impacts of climate change, land use change and invasive species on natural resources and biodiversity. NEON is a project of the U.S. National Science Foundation, with many other U.S. agencies and NGOs cooperating.
NEON has a mission of sharing science: "The NEON platform provides extraordinary opportunities for education. The platform will support a wide range of interactions ..."
The primary contact in the DC area is Brian Wee, Cheif of External Affairs bwee@neoninc.org.
« less full details »
Allow educational publishing companies of all sizes to make their materials available for download, whether fee-based or free. The Learning Registry should function like an iTunes for classroom content, providing a digital bridge between content providers and teachers/students. Flipcharts, eBooks, quizzes, special events that schools can sign up to stream, video modules on any subject for any grade level...all can and ...more »
Allow educational publishing companies of all sizes to make their materials available for download, whether fee-based or free. The Learning Registry should function like an iTunes for classroom content, providing a digital bridge between content providers and teachers/students. Flipcharts, eBooks, quizzes, special events that schools can sign up to stream, video modules on any subject for any grade level...all can and should be included in the database. The possibilities are endless!
« less full details »
Kids and Teachers alike are still familiar with sections in their school library classified by the Dewey Decimal system. Librarians and Technology Coordinators in K-12 use it daily. If search engines supported search by explicit classifications (Dewey, Library of Congress, others), it could make use of existing taxonomies.
I don't see this issue as a search engine problem so much as it is a content format problem. The biggest problem with accessing "learning content" right now is that most of what we call learning content (SCORM packages) is closer to being a mini-application than it is to being a pure provider of content. How can a search engine be expected to crawl a site that has its navigation locked away in a proprietary format....especially ...more »
I don't see this issue as a search engine problem so much as it is a content format problem. The biggest problem with accessing "learning content" right now is that most of what we call learning content (SCORM packages) is closer to being a mini-application than it is to being a pure provider of content.
How can a search engine be expected to crawl a site that has its navigation locked away in a proprietary format....especially one that intentionally restricts the learner (and thus crawler) from proceeding until mastery is demonstrated. Most SCORM packages right now are monolithic SCOs that have their own proprietary navigation. How can a search engine be expected to crawl what is essentially a proprietary application. We don't expect a search engine to crawl the contents of a video (yet), we only expect it to index the public metadata that is associated with that video. While this model presents problems for search engine discovery, it has merit and utility derived from the educational experience it delivers.
"Crawl-ability" is related to a similar problem of "link-ability". Right now, there typically isn't a way to link to and deliver just a small, but relevant, part of content.
Obvious solutions to these problems include structured content formats or small SCOs tied together with Sequencing and Navigation. Both of these solutions have merit, but impose strict requirements and limitations that discourage broad use.
Increased use of metadata is another option that should be encouraged and explored...again though without imposing undue burden on content creators.
Is the best alternative to continue to allow for black box, "application-like" content, but also let such content provide alternative versions / navigation paths that expose the actual learning content in a crawl-able/link-able manner?
« less full details »
Social Web